|
Predraft Rookies - Cornerbacks
|
|
Posted 4/6 by Sigmund Bloom, Exclusive to Footballguys.com
|
1. Jimmy Williams, Virginia Tech Hokies
6 3 213 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
22
|
22
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2004 |
37
|
23
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
| 2003 |
63
|
51
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
| 2002 |
28
|
17
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Jimmy Williams is a rare size/speed specimen at defensive back and is the most
likely of the excellent CB/S tweeners (Huff, Allen, and Williams) to be a cornerback
in the NFL. Hes a very physical player that has an intimidating swagger
about him. Hes a monster in press coverage and is excellent at executing
the jam at the line of scrimmage. Williams is also a hard worker. His hitting,
speed, and good tackling makes an impact in run support. Hes a quick,
athletic player, and also has good receiving skills to secure interceptions
when the opportunity is there.
Negatives
Williams is not a great DB in zone coverage and he doesn't read and react
as fast as some of the other elite DBs in this draft, although his speed helps
offset this. His aggressive style will also take him out of position on some
plays. His cockiness is very strong, and he got kicked out of his last college
game.
Numbers Game
4.44 Williams 40 time at his pro day (he didn't work out at the
combine) highlights his top notch size/speed package.
NFL Comparison
Bobby Taylor/Chris McAlister
Summary
Jimmy Williams is a unique player that combines speed and athleticism with
a very nasty style of play. Hes not the most instinctive or technically
advanced DB, but his tools will likely make him the first or second CB off the
board in the draft. His physical play and strong presence in run support should
make him a quality CB for IDP dynasty leagues.
2. Tye Hill, Clemson Tigers - 5'10"
185 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
35
|
8
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
| 2004 |
38
|
14
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
| 2003 |
34
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2002 (at RB) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Tye Hill is one of the fastest players in the entire draft, and hes a
natural shutdown cover corner. Hes an incredibly smooth athlete in change
of direction and can often use this plus his speed to recover when beaten. Hill
is small, but very willing to be physical in run support and press coverage.
Hes an explosive athlete beyond his elite speed, including a 41
vertical that helps offset his height disadvantage. Hes got excellent
skills to get to the ball and can mirror receivers better than any DB in this
draft.
Negatives
Hill is small, theres no way around this. Bigger WRs could take advantage
of him, and he may get lost in run support. Hes not very good in zone
coverage (see Sinorice Moss TD in the Senior Bowl), but he has been improving
over time. His hands are somewhat suspect and cause him to lose some interceptions.
Numbers Game
15 Hills pass breakups ended an astounding 15 scoring drives in
his junior year, showing how clutch he can be.
NFL Comparison
DeAngelo Hall
Summary
Tye Hill is the best man coverage corner in the draft, period. He will instantly
bolster the defensive backfield of the team that drafts him and could develop
into an elite shutdown corner as he is only 3 years removed from a switch to
defense from RB. He will be an excellent fantasy CB for at least the first few
years of his career while teams test him.
3. Antonio Cromartie, Florida State Seminoles
- 6'2" 208 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
KO Rets
|
Yds
|
| 2005 (torn ACL) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2004 |
18
|
4
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
19
|
435
|
| 2003 |
17
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
24
|
568
|
Positives
Like Jimmy Williams, Cromartie possesses a rare combination of size, speed,
and athleticism. Hes a strong force in run support and can deliver the
crushing hit. He is a strong performer in press coverage and has the speed to
recover on even the speediest of wide receivers. His change of direction and
leaping skills are top notch.
Negatives
Cromartie is an extremely raw player. Hes never been a full-time starter
and missed the entire 2005 season with a torn ACL. He lacks technique and instincts
and will need some development to unlock his full potential. He does have a
large bust risk for such a highly regarded player.
Numbers Game
1 Cromartie has started one game in his college career.
NFL Comparison
Chris Gamble
Summary
Antonio Cromartie has as much upside as any defensive back in the entire draft,
but he carries more risk than most of the first day rated defensive backs. He
could be a jackpot pick in late first/early second if his development goes well.
His size and physical style of play insures that he will be a quality fantasy
CB.
4. Johnathan Joseph, South Carolina Gamecocks
511 193 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
40
|
15
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
| 2004 (hurt) |
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Johnathan Joseph is the only CB in the draft who would have a chance to beat
Tye Hill in a footrace. Hes an instinctive DB who has the speed and change
of direction ability to recover when a receiver gets the best of him. Hes
a hard worker who shows improvement in weak areas when he concentrates on them.
Joseph also has very good hands and has returned kickoffs on occasion. Hes
great in man coverage and has no problem mirroring wide receivers.
Negatives
Joseph is not the strongest or most physical DB, and hes average at best
at tackling and hitting. Hes not very polished in zone coverage, and his
inexperience leaves him lacking in reading and react skills. Hell sometimes
take unnecessary risks playing the ball instead of the man.
Numbers Game
14 Joseph only played 14 games at South Carolina the whole of
his Division I football career.
NFL Comparison
Dre Bly
Summary
Joseph joins Antonio Cromartie as a fast rising corner on many draft boards
despite a very limited of body of gameplay to evaluate showing just how
valuable speedy cover corners are in this league. He may get into the first
round and should be of the first 5 corners selected.
5. Ashton Youbuty, Ohio State Buckeyes
60 189 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
43
|
13
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
| 2004 |
47
|
14
|
4
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2003 |
13
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Youbuty is a fast, explosively athletic cover corner. Hes adept at man
coverage and uses his closing speed and athleticism to make plays on the ball
in the air. Ashton uses his excellent speed and burst to close well on both
run and pass plays. Hes got the change of direction skills to mirror most
receivers. Unlike some of the higher ranked CBs, Youbuty is also very good in
zone coverage. Another plus is that Youbuty is a natural receiver for a defensive
back.
Negatives
Youbuty is a gambler and he relies on his physical tools to make up for mental
lapses on the field. Hes not a big presence in run support, lacking the
size and hitting to make an impact. Youbuty came out as a junior and is still
raw and has a lot to learn about playing the position.
Numbers Game
4 Youbutys 4 interceptions in 2004 tied for the big 10 lead.
NFL Comparison
Charles Tillman
Summary
Youbuty has the tools to be a very good cover corner in the NFL. Hes
got to learn to rely less on his brilliant athleticism, but his potential should
get him into the second round of the draft.
6. Alan Zemaitis, Penn State Nittany Lions
61 195 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
34
|
13
|
5
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
| 2004 |
35
|
12
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
| 2003 |
49
|
22
|
4
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
| 2002 |
10
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Alan Zemaitis is a smart, strong, physical cornerback with top notch read and
react skills and football IQ. Hes got good range and hands and puts himself
in position to make many big plays enough that college teams started
to throw away from his part of the field in his junior year. Hes a strong
hitter and is very good at getting jams on the receiver off the line of scrimmage.
Hes got the agility and athleticism to play in tight coverage, and the
speed and closing ability to play loose. Hes also a tough kid that came
back from a serious car accident in 2003 faster and better than anyone expected.
Negatives
Zemaitis lacks the top end speed and athleticism of the top 5 CBs in this class.
Some see him being moved to safety in the NFL.
Numbers Game
19 The opposing team completed a grand total of 19 passes to the player
Zemaitis was covering in 2005.
NFL Comparison
Mike McKenzie
Summary
Zemaitis may not have the eye-popping measurables and athletic ability of the
top CBs in this class, but his intangibles and hard-nosed style are probably
the best in this class. Hes been a big play/shutdown CB at a top level
of competition and will contribute to his NFL immediately. He should definitely
be a first day pick.
7. Will Blackmon, Boston College Eagles
60 198 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
KO Rets
|
Yds
|
Punt Rets
|
Yds
|
| 2005 (at WR) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
189
|
15
|
124
|
| 2004 |
30
|
16
|
3
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
28
|
762
|
23
|
261
|
| 2003 |
50
|
14
|
4
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
36
|
922
|
8
|
92
|
| 2002 |
22
|
7
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
28
|
630
|
4
|
29
|
Positives
Will Blackmon is a very athletic explosive player who made an impact as a corner,
wide receiver, and return specialist in college. Hes a smooth player in
coverage and his hands are elite for a DB, as evidenced by his being to start
at WR in his senior year. When he was a corner, he showed good ability to mirror
the receiver and close on the ball in flight. He is an elite kickoff returner,
coming close to breaking the all-time NCAA Division record for career kickoff
return yardage. He has good size for a corner.
Negatives
Blackmon has now spent an entire year away from the cornerback position and
has a lot of work to do to catch up. He is unlikely to stick at WR in the NFL
despite working out as one at the combine. He doesn't have elite timed
speed. Blackmon is not a particularly physical or strong player.
Numbers Game
51/763/4 Blackmons line as a WR in his senior was pretty good
considering that he hadn't played there before in his collegiate career.
NFL Comparison
Nathan Vasher
Summary
Like many of the CBs on this list, Blackmon has an element of risk because
of lack of experience at his position. He might not be the 7th CB off the board
at the draft, but he should be bumped up for fantasy because of how dangerous
he is with the ball in his hands.
8. Richard Marshall, Fresno State Bulldogs
511 189 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
Punt Rets
|
Yds
|
| 2005 |
57
|
21
|
3
|
-
|
1
|
2
|
-
|
14
|
307
|
| 2004 |
46
|
15
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
| 2003 |
27
|
10
|
3
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Richard Marshall is yet another burner with great athleticism in this class
of cornerbacks. He is elite at making plays on the ball in flight with his leaping
ability, hands, and adjustments. Marshall is a true ball thief and generally
a solid tackler. He can also contribute as a kickoff returner.
Negatives
Marshall is not a particularly tough or physical player and doesn't show
up much in run support. He has smaller than ideal height and bulk. Hes
not the best at reading and reacting, and relies on his speed to recover.
Numbers Game
35 Marshall averaged an astounding 35 yards on his nine interception
returns at Fresno State.
NFL Comparison
Terrell Buckley
Summary
Marshall is not very polished, but his speed, ball skills, and gamebreaking
ability on interception returns should get him drafted on the first day in a
league that values cornerbacks so much.
9. Kelly Jennings, Miami (FL) Hurricanes
511 178 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
24
|
8
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
| 2004 |
19
|
11
|
2
|
0.5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2003 |
12
|
6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2002 |
21
|
4
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Jennings joins many others on this list with elite timed speed. Hes also
got a great vertical leap and change of direction ability. His speed gives him
great range and hes good at anticipating routes. Hes a tenacious
player whose ball skills help make up for his lack of height and size. Hes
also got great hands for a DB.
Negatives
Jennings is small and may not have the room to get much bigger, possibly relegating
to him a nickel back role in the NFL. He does not excel in zone coverage, and
like many of the other speedsters on this list, will rely on his speed to make
up for mental lapses. Hes a willing tackler, but too small to bring the
lumber and likely to be a marginal tackler against NFL sized offensive skill
players.
Numbers Game
3.0 Jennings GPA got him on the ACC All-Academic team in 2005.
NFL Comparison
Aaron Glenn
Summary
Jennings has been a shutdown corner in college, but he will struggle to overcome
his lack of size at the next level. Still, DBs who can cover are in demand,
and he should go on the first day.
10. DeMario Minter, Georgia Bulldogs
5 11 190 lbs.
| Season |
Tackles
|
Asst
|
INTs
|
Sacks
|
FFs
|
FRs
|
TDs
|
| 2005 |
36
|
12
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
| 2004 |
42
|
9
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
| 2003 |
8
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| 2002 |
10
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Positives
Minter is a strong and physically cut cover corner. Hes a very sound
tackler and a hard-nosed presence in run support. Hes good at establishing
tight coverage and has good, but not elite speed. DeMario changes direction
well and is an athletic corner. Minter also has the leaping ability and body
control to make plays on the ball in flight.
Negatives
DeMario has below average hands and loses interceptions because of it. Hes
not very good in zone coverage. His less than ideal size will lessen his impact
in the running game at the next level.
Numbers Game
7 Seven times Minter held his receiver without a catch for the entire
game.
NFL Comparison
Daylon McCutcheon
Summary
Minter is a very solid corner, but he lacks the upside and elite tools of most
of the corners on this list. Hes worth watching for IDP dynasty leagues
if he lands a starting gig eventually because new corners get picked on, but
hes unlikely to be more than an average pro cornerback.
|