Quarterback By Committee 2014

Chase Stuart's Quarterback By Committee 2014 Chase Stuart Published 06/19/2014

This is the eleventh straight season that Footballguys.com has published its annual Quarterback By Commitee article.  For those fantasy players who like to wait on drafting their quarterback while stocking their team at the other positions, this is the article for you. 

Quarterback scoring is significantly higher than it used to be; the reason I started writing the QBBC article was because there were only a handful of elite fantasy quarterbacks.  Technically, that's still true -- being QB12 won't make you elite -- but it is easy to make the argument that any number of roughly half the starting quarterbacks in the NFL could finish with top-five seasons.  Years ago, the options were:

  • Spend an early pick on one of the four or five elite quarterbacks;
  • Settle (i.e., reach) for QB7-QB12 a few rounds later; or
  • Go the QBBC route, and find two top-18 quarterbacks with great schedules

The general rule for QBBC fans is that the first six rounds of your draft should be used to assemble a wealth of talent at running back, wide receiver, and, if the draft unfolds in such a way, tight end. By going the QBBC route, you can save those high picks in your draft and still get solid fantasy production by grabbing two QBs who face bad defenses nearly every week of the year. That's what the QBBC system is all about.

Of course, in some leagues, QB10 can now be had as late as the seventh round, and your fifth-ranked quarterback could still be available that late. One could argue that the best strategy is 2014 is to wait until the first ten quarterbacks are off the board and then draft a couple of quarterbacks at a nice discount. Colin Kaepernick, Tony Romo, and Russell Wilson have ADPs of QB11, QB12, and QB13, and all have high upside for 2014. That's one option, but another option is to wait even longer and implement a quarterback-by-committee strategy.

The first key, of course, is to rank the defenses. I always start by adjusting last season's data on defenses for strength of schedule. I started with the adjusted FP rankings for each defense listed in the Rearview QB article. Then, I made some adjustments to the defenses based on their efficiency numbers from 2013 and what's happened since the end of last season. The table below lists my rating for defenses for fantasy quarterbacks, listed from the toughest (the Seahawks) to the easiest (Dallas).  Quarterbacks facing Seattle should expect to produce about five fantasy points below average, while passers facing the Cowboys will be projected to score three more points than average.

RkTeamSOS
1 Seattle Seahawks -5.0
2 San Francisco 49ers -2.5
3 Carolina Panthers -2.5
4 Cincinnati Bengals -2.0
5 St. Louis Rams -1.5
6 Buffalo Bills -1.5
7 New York Giants -1.5
8 New Orleans Saints -1.5
9 Baltimore Ravens -1.0
10 Pittsburgh Steelers -1.0
11 Arizona Cardinals -1.0
12 Miami Dolphins -1.0
13 New England Patriots -0.5
14 New York Jets 0.0
15 Houston Texans 0.0
16 Cleveland Browns 0.0
17 Denver Broncos 0.0
18 Kansas City Chiefs 0.5
19 Tennessee Titans 0.5
20 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.5
21 Chicago Bears 1.0
22 Washington Redskins 1.0
23 Detroit Lions 1.0
24 Green Bay Packers 1.0
25 Philadelphia Eagles 1.5
26 Indianapolis Colts 1.5
27 San Diego Chargers 1.5
28 Oakland Raiders 2.0
29 Jacksonville Jaguars 2.5
30 Atlanta Falcons 2.5
31 Minnesota Vikings 2.5
32 Dallas Cowboys 3.0

The main key to the QBBC philosophy is to identify which defenses should rank in the bottom quarter of the league when it comes to stopping quarterbacks. Oakland, Jacksonville, Atlanta, Minnesota, and Dallas were juicy matchups for fantasy quarterbacks last year, and project as similarly enticing in 2014. San Diego, Indianapolis, and Philadelphia look are attractive, too, as those teams are likely to get into some shootouts this year. The Chargers and Colts have a lot of question marks on defense, and while the Eagles defense was pretty efficient last year, the fast-paced offense leads to lots of opportunities for opposing quarterbacks.

Once we rank the defenses, it's easy to then figure out which QB pairings work based on schedule. When the quarterback is home, his opponents gets a +0.3 adjustment, so a quarterback hosting the Cowboys receives a score of +3.3.  When that quarterback is on the road, adjustment is 0.3 in the other direction, so playing in Dallas is worth +2.7. Below is a list of all 496 possible combinations. These are ranked from most favorable to least, with strength of schedule being the only determining factor.

RkCombinationValueRkCombinationValueRkCombinationValueRkCombinationValueRkCombinationValue
1 NYG-TB 26.5 101 IND-PIT 17 201 GB-SEA 15 301 SF-STL 12.7 401 CAR-OAK 8.7
2 CHI-NYG 25.2 102 SEA-TEN 17 202 NO-TEN 15 302 GB-SF 12.6 402 CLE-OAK 8.6
3 NO-NYG 23.1 103 BAL-MIA 16.9 203 PHI-WAS 15 303 KC-MIA 12.6 403 OAK-TB 8.6
4 NYG-TEN 23.1 104 DET-HOU 16.9 204 CHI-MIA 14.9 304 ARI-ATL 12.5 404 KC-SD 8.5
5 ARI-IND 22.7 105 GB-PIT 16.9 205 DEN-NE 14.9 305 DAL-MIN 12.5 405 CLE-MIN 8.4
6 MIA-NYG 22.6 106 IND-NYG 16.9 206 BAL-MIN 14.8 306 ATL-IND 12.5 406 KC-NYJ 8.3
7 ARI-GB 22.5 107 NE-NO 16.9 207 DET-MIN 14.8 307 GB-TB 12.3 407 ATL-DAL 8.2
8 MIA-STL 22.5 108 SF-WAS 16.9 208 DET-NYJ 14.8 308 JAC-TB 12.3 408 CLE-KC 8.2
9 MIA-PHI 22.1 109 BAL-CHI 16.8 209 BUF-SD 14.7 309 NO-SD 12.2 409 PIT-SD 8.2
10 GB-NYG 22 110 ARI-MIA 16.8 210 JAC-SD 14.7 310 KC-TEN 12.2 410 SEA-SF 8.2
11 HOU-JAC 22 111 NO-PHI 16.7 211 CIN-IND 14.7 311 BAL-CLE 12.2 411 OAK-SEA 8.1
12 NYG-PHI 21.9 112 CAR-CLE 16.7 212 CLE-DET 14.7 312 CLE-PIT 12.2 412 BUF-OAK 8
13 HOU-MIA 21.8 113 IND-SEA 16.7 213 DET-IND 14.7 313 DET-TB 12.2 413 GB-OAK 8
14 JAC-NYG 21.7 114 BAL-WAS 16.6 214 ARI-MIN 14.6 314 NE-TB 12.2 414 KC-SF 8
15 ARI-NO 21.6 115 CLE-IND 16.6 215 GB-JAC 14.6 315 BUF-DEN 12.1 415 OAK-PIT 7.9
16 DET-NYG 21.5 116 CLE-NYG 16.6 216 HOU-PIT 14.6 316 DAL-SD 12.1 416 PHI-STL 7.7
17 HOU-NO 21.5 117 MIN-PHI 16.6 217 BAL-SF 14.6 317 DET-PIT 12.1 417 BAL-DEN 7.6
18 HOU-TB 21.5 118 ATL-NYG 16.6 218 GB-MIN 14.6 318 NO-OAK 12.1 418 ATL-JAC 7.6
19 CHI-NO 21.4 119 CIN-HOU 16.6 219 PHI-SF 14.6 319 KC-SEA 12.1 419 ATL-MIA 7.5
20 GB-MIA 21.3 120 CLE-JAC 16.5 220 SD-TB 14.6 320 DAL-SF 12 420 ATL-TB 7.5
21 NYG-WAS 21.3 121 BAL-IND 16.5 221 ARI-DAL 14.5 321 NO-PIT 11.9 421 ATL-MIN 7.1
22 CHI-HOU 21.1 122 CAR-HOU 16.5 222 ARI-HOU 14.5 322 CAR-SD 11.8 422 DEN-PIT 7.1
23 NYG-STL 21.1 123 CAR-NE 16.5 223 CAR-GB 14.5 323 DEN-SF 11.8 423 CLE-SD 7.1
24 ARI-JAC 21 124 CLE-PHI 16.5 224 CIN-DET 14.5 324 MIN-PIT 11.8 424 ATL-KC 6.9
25 DAL-NYG 21 125 CHI-NE 16.4 225 DAL-NE 14.5 325 IND-KC 11.7 425 BAL-CAR 6.9
26 GB-WAS 20.9 126 ATL-PHI 16.4 226 IND-TEN 14.5 326 SD-SEA 11.7 426 CIN-KC 6.9
27 TB-TEN 20.8 127 CAR-IND 16.4 227 JAC-NO 14.5 327 DEN-JAC 11.6 427 OAK-TEN 6.4
28 CHI-PHI 20.7 128 BUF-MIA 16.3 228 MIN-STL 14.5 328 KC-STL 11.6 428 ATL-DEN 6.4
29 BUF-HOU 20.6 129 BUF-CLE 16.3 229 NYJ-STL 14.5 329 NYJ-OAK 11.6 429 DET-OAK 6.1
30 ARI-BUF 20.3 130 CHI-DAL 16.3 230 CHI-KC 14.4 330 SD-SF 11.6 430 MIN-OAK 6.1
31 ARI-TEN 20.2 131 HOU-SF 16.3 231 PIT-WAS 14.4 331 SD-TEN 11.6 431 DEN-OAK 5.2
32 CAR-MIA 20.1 132 DET-WAS 16.2 232 MIA-PIT 14.3 332 STL-TB 11.6 432 DEN-KC 5.1
33 GB-NO 20.1 133 JAC-MIN 16.2 233 ARI-BAL 14.2 333 DET-KC 11.6 433 DAL-DEN 4.7
34 GB-HOU 20 134 NE-NYJ 16.2 234 CAR-SEA 14.2 334 DEN-HOU 11.5 434 OAK-SD 4.3
35 NYG-PIT 20 135 ATL-CAR 16.2 235 CAR-STL 14.2 335 MIA-WAS 11.5 435 ATL-SD 4.2
36 PHI-TEN 20 136 BAL-HOU 16.1 236 CLE-GB 14.2 336 KC-NYG 11.5 436 BAL-KC 4.1
37 CIN-NYG 19.6 137 BAL-NO 16.1 237 DAL-GB 14.2 337 KC-WAS 11.4 437 CHI-OAK 3.9
38 CHI-WAS 19.5 138 CAR-NO 16.1 238 IND-JAC 14.2 338 CIN-NE 11.4 438 KC-OAK 3.6
39 JAC-WAS 19.5 139 CHI-CLE 16.1 239 DEN-MIA 14.1 339 CLE-SF 11.3 439 DAL-KC 3.1
40 ARI-NYG 19.3 140 NE-SEA 16.1 240 DEN-WAS 14.1 340 CAR-CIN 11.2 440 GB-TEN 2.4
41 NE-NYG 19.3 141 CIN-GB 16.1 241 KC-TB 14.1 341 CAR-SF 11.2 441 HOU-IND 1.3
42 BUF-WAS 19.1 142 JAC-NE 16.1 242 NE-SF 14.1 342 NYJ-SEA 11.2 442 NYG-SF 1.3
43 ARI-CHI 19 143 MIA-MIN 16.1 243 NO-NYJ 14.1 343 IND-OAK 11.1 443 HOU-NE 0.3
44 BUF-NYG 19 144 ATL-HOU 16 244 BAL-NYG 14.1 344 HOU-SEA 11.1 444 MIN-WAS 0.3
45 DEN-NYG 19 145 BAL-TB 16 245 DEN-IND 14.1 345 MIN-SF 11 445 DET-GB 0
46 NO-SEA 19 146 DAL-MIA 16 246 IND-STL 14.1 346 ATL-SEA 11 446 BUF-GB 0
47 NYG-NYJ 18.8 147 HOU-NYG 16 247 SF-TB 14.1 347 ATL-STL 11 447 BUF-CHI -0.1
48 BUF-SEA 18.6 148 JAC-MIA 16 248 NYG-SD 14 348 BAL-DET 11 448 HOU-WAS -0.2
49 CHI-STL 18.6 149 SD-STL 16 249 PIT-TB 14 349 DAL-NO 11 449 CHI-TEN -0.2
50 GB-PHI 18.6 150 NYJ-PHI 16 250 DAL-WAS 13.9 350 DEN-MIN 11 450 ATL-OAK -0.4
51 NYJ-WAS 18.6 151 BUF-TB 15.9 251 MIN-TEN 13.9 351 NO-SF 11 451 DET-TEN -1.1
52 BUF-NE 18.5 152 DAL-TEN 15.9 252 NO-STL 13.9 352 ATL-NO 11 452 BUF-TEN -1.6
53 STL-TEN 18.5 153 MIA-NO 15.9 253 PHI-SEA 13.9 353 DEN-NYJ 11 453 SD-WAS -1.6
54 HOU-TEN 18.3 154 ARI-DET 15.8 254 MIA-TB 13.9 354 NE-OAK 11 454 PHI-TB -2.2
55 IND-MIA 18.2 155 CIN-NO 15.7 255 CHI-TB 13.8 355 JAC-SF 10.8 455 IND-WAS -2.2
56 ARI-PHI 18.1 156 CIN-TEN 15.7 256 CIN-TB 13.8 356 CLE-NE 10.8 456 ARI-STL -2.5
57 ARI-SF 18.1 157 CLE-NYJ 15.7 257 CIN-SD 13.7 357 ATL-SF 10.7 457 BAL-JAC -2.7
58 JAC-PHI 18.1 158 DAL-SEA 15.7 258 BUF-PIT 13.7 358 DET-SD 10.7 458 ARI-CIN -3
59 NYG-OAK 18.1 159 IND-NYJ 15.7 259 BAL-SEA 13.7 359 OAK-PHI 10.7 459 IND-SD -3.1
60 CAR-NYG 18.1 160 PIT-SEA 15.7 260 GB-STL 13.7 360 ATL-PIT 10.6 460 CIN-STL -3.1
61 STL-WAS 18.1 161 BAL-GB 15.6 261 MIA-SD 13.7 361 ATL-NE 10.6 461 IND-MIN -3.2
62 BAL-NE 18 162 CHI-MIN 15.6 262 BUF-CIN 13.6 362 BAL-SD 10.6 462 DAL-JAC -3.7
63 HOU-PHI 18 163 CHI-SF 15.6 263 CIN-SF 13.6 363 BUF-KC 10.6 463 NE-SD -4.1
64 NE-TEN 18 164 DET-SEA 15.6 264 HOU-NYJ 13.6 364 DEN-DET 10.6 464 HOU-SD -4.1
65 BUF-PHI 17.9 165 JAC-SEA 15.6 265 MIN-NYJ 13.6 365 ARI-PIT 10.5 465 BUF-DET -4.2
66 TEN-WAS 17.9 166 JAC-TEN 15.6 266 CIN-NYJ 13.6 366 OAK-SF 10.5 466 MIN-NE -4.3
67 BUF-MIN 17.8 167 IND-TB 15.6 267 DAL-HOU 13.6 367 DEN-TB 10.4 467 CLE-STL -4.5
68 NO-TB 17.8 168 BUF-NYJ 15.6 268 DET-MIA 13.6 368 DAL-OAK 10.2 468 IND-NE -4.6
69 DET-SF 17.7 169 CLE-HOU 15.6 269 MIN-NYG 13.6 369 CAR-DEN 10.1 469 ATL-TEN -4.8
70 CHI-CIN 17.7 170 CLE-MIA 15.6 270 CAR-WAS 13.5 370 CHI-SD 10.1 470 DAL-NYJ -4.8
71 PHI-SD 17.7 171 GB-NE 15.6 271 CIN-JAC 13.5 371 CIN-DAL 10.1 471 CHI-GB -5
72 MIA-SEA 17.7 172 DET-JAC 15.5 272 NE-STL 13.5 372 DAL-DET 10.1 472 HOU-MIN -5.3
73 CHI-PIT 17.6 173 BUF-STL 15.5 273 PIT-SF 13.5 373 OAK-WAS 10.1 473 BAL-NYJ -5.5
74 PIT-STL 17.6 174 JAC-PIT 15.5 274 SEA-TB 13.5 374 ATL-CIN 10.1 474 SEA-STL -5.6
75 CLE-TEN 17.6 175 JAC-STL 15.5 275 HOU-KC 13.4 375 OAK-STL 10.1 475 JAC-NYJ -5.6
76 MIA-SF 17.6 176 PHI-PIT 15.5 276 BAL-PHI 13.4 376 CIN-WAS 9.9 476 CHI-DET -5.9
77 NYJ-TEN 17.6 177 DET-NO 15.5 277 DEN-TEN 13.4 377 DAL-PIT 9.9 477 ATL-BUF -6.1
78 ARI-NE 17.5 178 ATL-WAS 15.4 278 PIT-TEN 13.3 378 BAL-BUF 9.9 478 CIN-CLE -6.1
79 ARI-NYJ 17.5 179 BUF-SF 15.4 279 BUF-NO 13.2 379 KC-NE 9.8 479 MIA-OAK -6.2
80 CAR-TB 17.5 180 DEN-GB 15.4 280 CLE-DAL 13.2 380 BAL-PIT 9.7 480 CIN-SEA -6.2
81 CHI-NYJ 17.5 181 MIN-NO 15.3 281 CIN-PHI 13.2 381 CAR-KC 9.7 481 NE-WAS -6.3
82 MIA-NE 17.5 182 CAR-NYJ 15.2 282 DAL-STL 13.2 382 ATL-BAL 9.7 482 ATL-GB -6.4
83 NYG-SEA 17.5 183 CHI-JAC 15.2 283 BUF-DAL 13.1 383 CIN-OAK 9.6 483 KC-NO -6.7
84 CAR-DET 17.4 184 DAL-PHI 15.2 284 HOU-OAK 13.1 384 ARI-SD 9.6 484 ARI-SEA -6.8
85 NYJ-TB 17.4 185 GB-IND 15.2 285 MIN-TB 13.1 385 DAL-TB 9.6 485 DEN-STL -7.2
86 CAR-MIN 17.3 186 GB-KC 15.2 286 SF-TEN 13.1 386 NYJ-SF 9.6 486 CAR-PIT -7.2
87 CHI-SEA 17.3 187 GB-NYJ 15.2 287 ARI-WAS 13 387 DEN-SD 9.6 487 CLE-DEN -7.8
88 MIA-NYJ 17.3 188 NE-PHI 15.2 288 CAR-PHI 13 388 JAC-OAK 9.5 488 DEN-SEA -7.9
89 CAR-JAC 17.2 189 SEA-WAS 15.2 289 CIN-MIA 13 389 MIN-SEA 9.5 489 CLE-SEA -8.1
90 CHI-DEN 17.2 190 CIN-MIN 15.1 290 DEN-NO 13 390 DEN-PHI 9.5 490 ARI-DEN -8.2
91 BAL-TEN 17.1 191 DET-NE 15.1 291 NYJ-PIT 13 391 BAL-CIN 9.3 491 CIN-DEN -9.2
92 CAR-CHI 17.1 192 GB-SD 15.1 292 IND-PHI 13 392 JAC-KC 9.2 492 ARI-CLE -9.6
93 CHI-IND 17.1 193 BUF-CAR 15.1 293 IND-SF 13 393 CLE-TB 9.1 493 ATL-CHI -10.6
94 CLE-NO 17.1 194 BUF-IND 15.1 294 ARI-KC 13 394 CAR-DAL 9 494 BAL-DAL -10.7
95 MIA-TEN 17.1 195 CIN-PIT 15.1 295 TB-WAS 13 395 BAL-OAK 9 495 ATL-DET -13.2
96 NO-WAS 17.1 196 DAL-IND 15.1 296 CLE-WAS 12.9 396 KC-MIN 9 496 MIN-SD -13.8
97 CAR-TEN 17.1 197 IND-NO 15.1 297 BUF-JAC 12.8 397 KC-PHI 9  
98 ARI-TB 17 198 BAL-STL 15 298 ARI-CAR 12.7 398 KC-PIT 8.9  
99 HOU-STL 17 199 DET-PHI 15 299 NYJ-SD 12.7 399 ATL-NYJ 8.9  
100 NE-PIT 17 200 DET-STL 15 300 ARI-OAK 12.7 400 ATL-CLE 8.7  

The top combination, based purely on strength of schedule, would be the Giants and Buccaneers. But the second best combination features New York and the Bears, and an Eli Manning/Jay Cutler combination is a bit more palatable to me.  Consider that in 2013, the Chicago team quarterback ranked 4th in fantasy points. And while Manning had a terrible season last year, an improved offensive line and the additions of Odell Beckham, Jr. and Rashad Jennings could lead to a rebound season. More importantly, take a look at the combined schedule of Manning and Cutler:

  • Week 1: Giants @ Lions
  • Week 2: Giants vs. Cardinals
  • Week 3: Giants vs. Texans
  • Week 4: Bears vs. Packers
  • Week 5: Giants vs. Falcons
  • Week 6: Bears @ Falcons
  • Week 7: Giants @ Cowboys
  • Week 8: Bears @ Patriots
  • Week 9: Giants vs. Colts
  • Week 10: Bears @ Packers
  • Week 11: Bears vs. Vikings
  • Week 12: Giants vs. Cowboys
  • Week 13: Giants @ Jaguars
  • Week 14: Bears vs. Cowboys
  • Week 15: Giants vs. Redskins
  • Week 16: Bears vs. Lions

Having a great fantasy quarterback is nice, but having a great fantasy schedule without having to use high draft picks is really nice, too.  Here, we get three games against the Cowboys defense, which projects as the most favorable fantasy opponent this season.  The duo also has two games each against the Falcons and Lions, one each against the Jaguars and Vikings, and also home games against Indianapolis, Green Bay, and Washington. Just about every week the matchup is strong, and the combination has only six road games.

Of course, if you don't want Cutler and Manning, you can scan the table above and find how any other pair of schedules interact. Manning's schedule also teams up well with not just Cutler and Josh McCown, but Ryan Tannehill, Tony Romo, Cam Newton, Ben Roethlisberger, Andy Dalton, and a host of others. Cutler's schedule works well with Carson Palmer, Dalton, and Roethlisberger, too.

Picking Just One Quarterback?

Even if you don't believe in committees, or have no preset draft plan, it pays to know how tough of a schedule each team has. So let's close with a look at the quarterbacks with the easiest schedules. In leagues with small rosters, it's difficult to go QBBC, so it's helpful to know which quarterbacks have the easiest (EJ Manuel) and toughest (Matt Schaub) schedules.


RkTmSOS
1 Buf 7.3
2 NYG 7.2
3 Hou 6.7
4 Mia 6.7
5 Ten 6.7
6 Ind 5.3
7 NE 5.2
8 Jax 4.8
9 NYJ 4.3
10 Chi 3.3
11 NO 2.8
12 Det 1.8
13 Cin 0.3
14 GB 0.2
15 Min 0.2
16 Was 0.2
17 Phi -0.2
18 Pit -0.3
19 StL -0.7
20 TB -0.8
21 Car -1.2
22 Bal -2.3
23 Sea -2.3
24 Cle -2.7
25 Ari -3.7
26 Dal -4.7
27 Atl -5.8
28 SD -6.7
29 SF -6.8
30 Den -7.8
31 KC -8.3
32 Oak -8.7

Peyton Manning's schedule looks a lot harder this year, but he's still Peyton Manning. Meanwhile, Tom Brady and Andrew Luck each have top-ten schedules in 2014. If you're looking to break some times, the above table should help.

Photos provided by Imagn Images
Share This Article