Ultimate Strength of Schedule, Quarterbacks

Clayton Gray's Ultimate Strength of Schedule, Quarterbacks Clayton Gray Published 08/04/2019

The advantages offered by the Ultimate Strength of Schedule (USOS) when compared to traditional SOS displays are numerous and include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Fantasy Points Driven
    Fantasy football is all about scoring fantasy points, so USOS is based on fantasy points.
  • Removed Bias Of Schedule
    Consider the following scenario: Defense A faced the 16 best offenses while Defense B faced the 16 worst offenses. If both defenses allowed opposing quarterbacks to average 300 fantasy points last season, are they equally strong? Of course not; Defense A is far superior as they faced much better offenses. This bias of schedule has been removed from USOS.
  • Positional Breakdown
    If you are looking for a running back, it's much more relevant to see SOS data for running backs (rather than simply rushing data).

EXPLANATION OF USOS TABLES

Below, you will see tables for each positions USOS. Here is a brief explanation of the make-up of these tables.

The "Team" Column

This is simply the NFL team.

The Values

Each value in the table is the expected number of fantasy points on average or on a per-game basis (depending on the column).

The "2019" Column

This is the average expected fantasy points allowed by each team's opponents for this season.

The "EZ" Column

This is the number of easy opponents each team will face this season. An easy opponent is defined as one of the eight (seven during the bye weeks) worst defenses. Obviously, it is preferred to have players with as many easy games as possible.

The "TF" Column

This is the number of tough opponents each team will face this season. A tough opponent is defined as one of the eight (seven during the bye weeks) best defenses. Obviously, it is preferred to have players with as few tough games as possible.

The "1st3" Column

This is the SOS for the first three weeks of the NFL season. This value can be used to determine how players should be expected to open the season. Players with low values could easily stumble out of the gate.

The "1st5" Column

This is similar to "1st3" except that it covers the first five weeks of the NFL season (note that some teams only play four games in this time frame).

The "Byes" Column

This is the SOS covering the bye weeks. This value can be used to find a complementary player during the byes as you'll need to shuffle players in and out of your starting lineup. A player with an easy schedule during this time would be nice to have.

The "14to16" Column

This is similar to "1st3" except that it specifically covers Week 14 through Week 16.

The "15to17" Column

This is similar to "14to16" except that it specifically covers Week 15 through Week 17.

The "W01" through "W17" Columns

These values are the expected strength of each team's opponent for that particular week (W05 is Week 5, etc). This is very useful when searching for backups for your stud players. The key is to locate players with easy opponents when your star is on a bye.

The Coloring of the Values

The blue values indicate that the team has one of the eight (seven during the bye weeks) best values in that column. The red values indicate that the team has one of the eight (seven during the bye weeks) worst values in that column.

(Note: a green / red combo was considered but some people are color blind between those two colors.)

In short:

  • Blue is a team with a good schedule
  • Red is a team with a bad schedule

ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE - QUARTERBACKS

Team
2019
EZ
TF
1st3
1st5
Byes
14to16
15to17
Arizona
21.2
5
1
19.5
21.0
21.9
20.7
21.0
Atlanta
21.3
4
3
21.3
21.5
21.3
20.5
21.0
Baltimore
21.5
7
2
22.0
21.0
22.2
19.9
21.2
Buffalo
21.2
6
3
22.2
21.7
21.2
19.6
22.4
Carolina
21.6
5
2
20.2
20.7
21.5
22.5
22.4
Chicago
21.0
2
4
20.5
20.4
21.2
22.5
22.3
Cincinnati
19.9
3
5
20.2
19.6
19.4
21.4
21.4
Cleveland
20.4
4
4
21.6
20.5
19.9
18.8
18.8
Dallas
21.0
4
4
20.7
21.2
21.0
21.1
21.9
Denver
20.9
3
6
20.7
19.9
20.2
24.2
23.4
Detroit
20.4
2
7
19.8
21.5
20.5
20.1
21.1
Green Bay
20.6
2
6
18.8
19.9
21.5
19.3
19.6
Houston
20.9
3
4
20.0
20.8
21.5
20.3
20.4
Indianapolis
21.4
4
3
20.3
21.9
21.6
22.0
20.8
Jacksonville
22.1
6
1
23.4
22.1
22.3
21.1
22.2
Kansas City
20.1
2
6
18.9
20.0
20.7
20.2
18.8
LA Chargers
21.4
3
3
22.5
21.8
21.0
19.8
22.4
LA Rams
20.5
4
4
20.9
21.6
21.1
21.2
19.3
Miami
20.5
6
6
19.3
19.1
20.2
22.2
21.7
Minnesota
21.1
4
3
22.1
20.8
21.3
20.6
19.6
New England
21.1
6
5
22.3
20.8
20.4
22.1
20.6
New Orleans
21.1
4
3
22.7
21.9
20.6
20.9
20.7
NY Giants
20.8
3
4
19.3
19.5
20.7
22.3
22.3
NY Jets
20.3
3
5
19.3
20.4
21.2
19.5
17.5
Oakland
21.3
5
5
21.5
21.0
22.0
18.9
18.9
Philadelphia
20.6
4
5
21.8
22.3
20.5
19.6
19.6
Pittsburgh
20.3
5
5
22.4
21.3
20.1
19.2
18.8
San Francisco
20.7
4
3
22.0
21.3
19.3
22.2
22.3
Seattle
20.6
4
5
22.0
20.8
19.9
19.7
19.9
Tampa Bay
21.3
4
3
20.5
21.1
20.6
22.5
22.9
Tennessee
21.2
4
4
19.9
19.8
21.1
22.8
23.6
Washington
20.8
3
4
20.5
20.6
20.7
21.4
20.6
NFL Average
20.9
4
4
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9

Week-By-Week Look

Team
W01
W02
W03
W04
W05
W06
W07
W08
W09
W10
W11
W12
W13
W14
W15
W16
W17
Ari
21.7
16
21
22.8
23.4
23
19
22.6
21.6
22.5
21.6
-
21.1
20.2
19.1
22.8
21.1
Atl
18.7
23.7
21.7
19.3
24.2
17
21.1
22.8
-
22.6
21
22.5
22.6
21
21.6
18.8
22.5
Bal
22.3
17
26.7
19.1
20.2
23.4
22.8
-
22.7
23.4
24.2
21.1
21.6
16.2
24.3
19.1
20.2
Buf
24.3
19
23.4
22.7
19.3
-
22.3
23.7
20.8
19.1
22.3
19.2
19.2
16
20.2
22.7
24.3
Car
21.1
22.5
17
24.2
18.8
22.5
-
21.6
19.3
21.6
23
22.6
20.8
23
22.8
21.7
22.6
Chi
21.6
19.2
20.8
18.7
21.8
-
22.6
18.6
23.7
21.7
21.1
19
21.7
19.2
21.6
26.7
18.7
Cin
22.8
21.6
16.2
20.2
17
16
18.8
21.1
-
16
21.8
20.2
24.3
19.1
22.7
22.3
19.1
Cle
19.3
24.3
21.1
16
21.6
22.8
-
22.7
19.2
16.2
20.2
22.3
20.2
23.4
17
16
23.4
Dal
19
20.8
22.3
22.6
21.6
24.3
23.7
-
19
18.7
21.7
22.7
16.2
18.6
21.1
23.7
20.8
Den
21.8
18.6
21.6
18.8
18.6
19.3
26.7
21.7
19.1
-
18.7
16.2
18.6
24.2
26.7
21.7
21.8
Det
17
18.6
23.7
26.7
-
21.6
18.7
19
21.8
18.6
19.2
20.8
18.6
18.7
22.5
19.2
21.6
GB
18.6
18.7
19.2
23.7
19.2
21.7
21.8
26.7
18.6
21
-
21.6
19
20.8
18.6
18.7
21.7
Hou
22.6
18.8
18.6
21
23
26.7
21.7
21.8
18.8
-
16
21.7
22.7
19.2
19.3
22.5
19.3
Ind
18.6
19.3
23
21.8
26.7
-
24.2
19.2
20.2
22.3
18.8
24.2
19.3
22.5
22.6
21
18.8
Jac
26.7
24.2
19.3
19.2
21
22.6
23.4
24.3
24.2
-
21.7
19.3
22.5
18.6
21.8
23
21.7
KC
18.8
21.8
16
21.7
21.7
24.2
19.2
21.6
18.7
19.3
18.6
-
21.8
22.7
19.2
18.6
18.6
LAC
21.7
21.7
24.2
22.3
19.2
20.2
19.3
18.6
21.6
21.8
26.7
-
19.2
18.8
18.7
21.8
26.7
LAR
21
22.6
19.1
22.5
22.8
21.6
23
23.4
-
20.2
18.6
16
17
22.8
19.2
21.6
17
Mia
16
22.7
19.2
18.6
-
20.8
16.2
20.2
24.3
21.7
16.2
19.1
23.7
24.3
19
23.4
22.7
Min
23
21.6
21.8
18.6
19
23.7
21.7
20.8
26.7
19.2
19.2
-
22.8
21.7
18.6
21.6
18.6
NE
20.2
22.3
24.3
16.2
20.8
19
24.3
19.1
16
-
23.7
19.2
24.2
26.7
23.4
16.2
22.3
NO
24.2
21.1
22.8
19.2
22.5
18.8
18.6
17
-
23
22.5
21
23
21.6
21.7
19.3
21
NYG
19.2
16.2
22.5
20.8
18.7
22.7
17
21.7
19.2
24.3
-
18.6
21.6
23.7
22.3
20.8
23.7
NYJ
16.2
19.1
22.7
-
23.7
19.2
22.7
18.8
22.3
19
20.8
21.8
23.4
22.3
16
20.2
16.2
Oak
19.2
26.7
18.7
21.7
18.6
-
21.6
24.2
21.7
18.6
23.4
24.3
26.7
19.3
18.8
18.6
19.2
Phi
20.8
23
21.7
21.6
24.3
18.7
19.2
16.2
18.6
-
22.7
22.8
22.3
19
20.8
19.2
19
Pit
22.7
22.8
21.6
23.4
16
18.6
-
22.3
21.7
21.1
19.1
23.4
19.1
17
16.2
24.3
16
SF
22.5
23.4
20.2
-
19.1
21.1
20.8
21
17
22.8
17
21.6
16
22.6
23
21.1
22.8
Sea
23.4
20.2
22.6
17
21.1
19.1
16
23
22.5
21.6
-
23.7
18.7
21.1
21
17
21.6
TB
21.6
21
19
21.1
22.6
21
-
19.3
22.8
17
22.6
23
18.8
21.7
21.7
24.2
23
Ten
19.1
21.7
18.8
23
16.2
19.2
18.6
22.5
21
26.7
-
18.8
21.7
21.8
24.2
22.6
24.2
Was
23.7
19.2
18.6
19
22.7
22.3
21.6
18.7
16.2
-
24.3
21.7
21
21.6
23.7
19
19.2
Avg
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.8
20.8
21.1
20.9
21.1
20.7
20.8
20.9
21.0
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.9
Photos provided by Imagn Images

More by Clayton Gray

 

NFFC ADP Movement: How High-Stakes ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

NFFC ADP offers a glimpse into the current state of high-stakes ADP and how it is moving.

07/11/25 Read More
 

NFFC ADP Movement: How High-Stakes ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

NFFC ADP offers a glimpse into the current state of high-stakes ADP and how it is moving.

07/11/25 Read More
 

Underdog ADP Movement: How Best-Ball ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

Underdog ADP offers insight into the current state of best-ball ADP and its ongoing movement.

07/06/25 Read More
 

NFFC ADP Movement: How High-Stakes ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

NFFC ADP offers a glimpse into the current state of high-stakes ADP and how it is moving.

07/04/25 Read More
 

Underdog ADP Movement: How Best-Ball ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

Underdog ADP offers insight into the current state of Best-Ball ADP and its ongoing movement.

06/29/25 Read More
 

NFFC ADP Movement: How High-Stakes ADP Is Changing

Clayton Gray

NFFC ADP offers a glimpse into the current state of high-stakes ADP and how it is moving.

06/27/25 Read More