Tight End Strategy in Salary Cap Leagues

The Footballguys staff shares their approach to the tight end position.

Footballguys Staff's Tight End Strategy in Salary Cap Leagues Footballguys Staff Published 08/20/2025

© Tork Mason / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images salary cap

See Other Positions: Quarterbacks | Running Backs | Wide Receivers

The great thing about salary cap leagues is that you can take your team in any direction you want. Your strategy options are completely wide open.

Our Footballguys staff recently sat down to discuss their favored options at quarterback when playing in a salary cap league.

Assume these league settings:

  • $200 cap
  • 12 teams
  • Full PPR
  • Starting Lineup
    • 1 QB
    • 2 RBs
    • 3 WRs
    • 1 TE
    • 1 flex (RB, WR, TE)

How do you approach the tight end position in a salary cap draft?

Do you prefer to target an elite player or look for a bargain? Are you more or less likely to price enforce at the position? How much of your budget do you allocate to tight ends?

Jeff Haseley: My target budget range for tight end is $10-15. Like quarterbacks, you don't want to be in a position of need with only one or two legit top-10 options remaining on the board, so it is wise to get your starting tight end secured sooner rather than later. If you want to take a flier on a tight end later in the draft, you have that luxury. Generally, I will stay around the $9-11 range, but if a tight end in my top 3-5 is available for $12 or even $13, I might strike. This also depends on my outlook for quarterback, running back, and wide receiver. If I sell out on a top-end tight end, I will need to reduce costs elsewhere. Salary cap drafts are always a give-and-take process for me. I stay close to my budget and know when I can spend and when I need to hold back. Overdoing it in this format can be costly, especially if you want to be one of the remaining teams with funds left with space to fill your roster when others have spent to their limit. 

Jason Wood: I'm rarely willing to invest heavily at tight end in a salary cap draft, because the cost pulls away from the priority of spending on running back and receiver, even if I'm budget-conscious at quarterback. I aim to land two clear starters for no more than $10 to $12 total (about 5% of the budget), with a preference to top out around $6 or $7 if the pool is still deep enough late, when everyone is bidding $1 or $2 to fill out rosters. I never price enforce at tight end due to those strict budget limits. Still, I will regularly nominate the pricier options, particularly the ones I expect to fall short of their consensus value, to bleed money from the room.

Already a subscriber?

Continue reading this content with a ELITE subscription.

An ELITE subscription is required to access content for Salary Cap leagues. If this league is not a Salary Cap league, you can edit your leagues here.

Photos provided by Imagn Images
Share This Article

More by Footballguys Staff

 

Everything Season Long and DFS for Wild Card Weekend

Your landing page for all of our weekly fantasy football content.

01/08/26 Read More
 

2026 Quarterback Offseason Preview: Free Agents, Cut Candidates, and Dynasty Inflection Points

Dave Kluge and Jeff Bell take a deep look at the potential moves around the NFL this offseason involving quarterbacks.

01/09/26 Read More
 

Rushing Matchups: Wildcard

Devin Knotts

A top-to-bottom ranking of this week's NFL rushing matchups, while providing details on both sides of the ball for the best and the worst pairings.

01/09/26 Read More
 

Dynasty, in Theory: Evaluating Rookie Receivers

Adam Harstad

Revisiting this year's rookies through the lens of the model

01/09/26 Read More
 

Passing Matchups: Wildcard

Devin Knotts

A top-to-bottom ranking of this week's NFL passing matchups, while providing details on both sides of the ball for the best and the worst pairings.

01/09/26 Read More
 

Cracking DraftKings Wild Card Weekend

Ben Cummins

A position-by-position overview of the cash and GPP contests available this week on DraftKings.

01/09/26 Read More