The New Reality No.253: Consistency is a Myth

With the season finally here, a final strategy session on overall roster strategy for title-seeking dynasty GMs should include discussing high-variance outcomes.

Consistency is a Myth

One myth running rampant in fantasy circles is the search for "safety" or "consistent" fantasy players. Mathematically, 99% of the consistent fantasy players are those without an elite ceiling. For a player's results to be consistent, they must cluster more tightly than their peers. Once a player hits 20, 25, or 30 points in a game, they will be high variance with any typical mundane performance. Also, fantasy is built upon a small string of chaos-filled plays by 22 players over 17 weeks with a variety of weather, matchups, injuries, and close calls for touchdowns, penalties, etc. Being consistent through all those factors is a fruitless goal and one that will not help your end result. Big pop games from players on your roster help far more than a poor game hurts your outcome. As the Dynasty Think Tank podcast tagline goes (hosting with Jordan McNamara) - seek elite results.

Few Players Matter...Much

While the nail-biting results down to the wire on Monday Night Football are what can fill social media posts and the drama in fantasy league chats and friends' texts, those are generally a rarity. Numerous studies on the margin of victory point to an average gap of 20-25 points between fantasy teams (depending on lineup size and positional scoring). This is larger than any player's points-per-game in a lineup, except maybe the quarterback position. This also means that adding one more elite player to a lineup (say, going from 10-12 points per game to 20 points per game) doesn't change as many game results as you might assume. Like football, fantasy is a team game and a cluster of chaotic events adding up to a singular weekly number. 

Based on the historical data, increasing a player in your lineup by 10 PPG would shift a loss to a win 27% of the time. A five PPG bump shifts the result 15% of the time. So the first lesson is that a few players impact your aggregate season result by more than potentially one game. This also applies to the reverse - too much blame is applied to a single player. Think Mark Andrews in September 2024. He was viewed as the reason a team started out 1-3 (or worse). Even if Andrews had averaged 10 PPG more during the month, it likely would have shifted one result on average, turning an 0-4 team into a 1-3 and a 1-3 into a 2-2 early record. Also, tight end is a generally low-scoring position and may not have impacted any matchups by himself.

The second lesson is acquiring these impact players earlier in the season. As a team, getting off to a good start and pushing for a coveted bye in leagues where six teams make the postseason is the most optimal. As a slow-starting team, acquiring a player who will make a difference is more about making the playoffs than securing a bye week later in the season, which is suboptimal on its face. The time value is significant for starting lineup upgrades, as their utility over 10-12 games versus as few as a handful if acquired right before the trade deadline is noteworthy.

Maximize Your Bench

With the season here, every roster spot is a finite and valuable resource. The obvious approach is to check every week for any player designation (IR, PUP, etc.) eligible for an IR demotion to free up a roster spot.

An advanced strategy in-season is to float roster spots. Defenses and kickers (in applicable leagues) are the easiest to exploit. Dropping a kicker or defense for waiver (or hold) options mid-week allows for speculation plays into the weekend. Typically, this surrounds an ambiguous injury situation that will be resolved by the end of the week's practice reports or by kickoff. This also allows for a few days to explore trade avenues to clear a roster spot if needed. In rare leagues where all kickers and defenses are generally rostered, this is the specific league construct where floating roster spots in this manner is very suboptimal.

A secondary method of floating roster spots surrounds injured or bye-week players. A league with enough depth to roster backup quarterbacks (Superflex) or shallow enough to not roster all of the primary backup running backs is an ideal setting to float these positions. When a backup quarterback or running back is entering a bye week, dropping them once the player will lock (might be any time post-waivers or close to kickoff in a worst case), a team can protect them from being acquired that week. The idea is that the player's starter cannot get injured during a bye week (or at least has minimal odds), and the backup will likely be more accessible (or not overly costly) to re-acquire the following week. Rather, take a roster spot for a backup whose starter is playing that week. While only a few percentage points within a singular week, stacking this strategy over many weeks of the season yields much higher odds of already rostering a primary backup when the starter does get injured in the week, saving valuable waiver resources the following week.

Embrace High-Variance Outcomes