In honor of John Lee having written this article for years, I’m going to take his format and repeat his Tips and Picks from 2020 to start the article as he said it far better than I could.
Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family!
“TIPS...
Pick your poison. In order to win a GPP on Thanksgiving, you are going to need at least one, possibly two, players who do well, but are also less than 10% owned. Because of the limited player pool, there will be a dozen players or more who are owned in the double-digit levels, which means that the overlap is going to be immense; the only way to differentiate your roster from the masses is to take a chance on a player you believe to be low-owned and in a situation to perform well.
Do not spend all of your salary. Part of the above advice (“Pick your poison”) is to purposefully build diversity into your lineups using players with perceived low ownership. Another way to achieve this goal is to leave a bit of salary on the table; do not be afraid to leave ~ 10-15% ($5,000 to $7,500) of your allocated salary unspent if you like your roster enough. Doing so will ensure that you have a unique roster that is capable of finishing atop a GPP roster. This bit of advice, of course, assumes that the rosters we are describing have enough upside to actually finish at the top of a tournament--do not leave money on the table just to start players who are seeing < 50% of the teams’ offensive snaps.
...AND PICKS
On a limited slate such as this, you are probably not going to like your resultant rosters because there just are not enough quality options in the player pool to build out a solid team. Instead, you should be thinking about building a core of key players and then supplementing around those players with secondary options, who you perceive to be in plus situations. For GPP lineups, you might drop to a tertiary threshold, whereby you add an element of consideration to ownership for those players who have upside relative to their respective salaries. The following section will briefly summarize those situations for the most relevant players on Thursday, which is followed up by a table that outlines those takes in a concise fashion. Best of luck!”
QUARTERBACKS
NAME |
OPP. |
SALARY |
CASH? |
GPP STARS |
NOTES |
NO |
$7,800 |
Yes |
«««« |
Premier quarterback on this slate, facing an elite New Orleans run defense |
|
LV |
$6,900 |
Yes |
«« |
Will be extremely popular, but with no Cooper, and heavy rushing approach, could be a good fade candidate in GPP’s |
|
@DAL |
$5,900 |
|
«««« |
Potential GPP leverage stack if Dallas gets out to an early lead and Las Vegas is forced to throw. |
|
CHI |
$5,100 |
- |
«« |
Will be lowest rostered of the bottom tier quarterbacks, has as much upside as any of them. |
|
@DET |
$5,500 |
- |
« |
Game manager facing a bad defense, but likely doesn’t have enough upside this week. |
|
Vs BUF |
$5,600 |
- |
« |
Very difficult matchup, easy fade with Taysom Hill being back |
This is an ugly slate of quarterbacks as four of the six quarterbacks are Jared Goff, Trevor Siemian, Andy Dalton and Derek Carr. In GPP’s a vast majority of roster percentages are going to funnel towards Josh Allen and Dak Prescott. Josh Allen takes on a funnel defense in New Orleans who are going to force Buffalo to throw the ball. New Orleans has allowed four quarterbacks this season to throw for over 300 yards. Outside of a weird Week 1 game in which the Saints blew out the Packers, the Saints have faced one of the easiest schedules in the NFL against the pass with the only top tier quarterback they faced being Tom Brady who had 375 yards and 4 touchdowns.
Derek Carr makes for a secondary option on this slate as the Raiders are 7.5 point underdogs, but this should be the highest scoring game of the week. Most people are going to be drawn towards Dak Prescott and the Cowboys passing offense, but Carr could provide leverage off of that particularly if the Cowboys get out to an early lead and rely on Ezekiel Elliott and Tony Pollard in this game. At just $5,900, Carr makes for a great play this week as he has shown upside this season throwing for over 300 yards in five games on the year.
RUNNING BACKS
NAME |
OPP. |
SALARY |
CASH? |
GPP STARS |
NOTES |
@DET |
$6,000 |
Yes |
«««« |
Lead running back facing the Lions who have allowed 3rd most fantasy points to opposing running backs this season. Will be very chalky ~60% rostered. |
|
DAndre Swift |
CHI |
$7,300 |
Yes |
«««« |
Expensive, but has topped 130 yards in each of his last two games. Neutral matchup vs the Bears. 17 or more touches in 5 straight games |
BUF |
$6,200 |
Yes |
«««« |
No Alvin Kamara at a discounted price. 15 receptions over last three games. Only 25% rostered far too low. |
|
LV |
$5,600 |
- |
«« |
18 carries over his last two games. Far less roster percentage than Elliott who is dealing with a knee injury. |
|
DAL |
$5,900 |
- |
« |
Usage has been too low in a game in which Las Vegas may be behind. Averaging just 8 carries per game over his last two games. |
|
LV |
$8,000 |
- |
« |
All signs should be towards playing Elliott as he’s a home touchdown favorite in a slightly favorable matchup. Problem is he’s not healthy as he’s dealing with a knee injury. At 40% rostered, he’s likely a fade as only averaging 11 carries over last three games |
This is a week in which the first decision you have to make is what you believe in Ezekiel Elliott. He’s the most expensive non-quarterback but dealing with a knee injury that has limited him to an average of just 11 carries per game. At $8,000 this is a decision that you will likely need to make as if Elliott is healthy and gets around 20 total touches, he’s likely going to be a no-brainer pick. However, if he’s not, then fading him can pay tremendous dividends. I’m recommending the fade here this week, as this is a week in which the Cowboys can likely once again have Tony Pollard have a role in this offense and with Elliott’s roster percentage being as high as it will be it makes sense to fade him. In cash games, it is almost impossible to take him with how good DAndre Swift has looked against two good run defenses over the last two weeks in Pittsburgh and Cleveland topping 130 yards in each of those games. By taking Elliott, you also lose out on one of David Montgomery and Mark Ingram. Montgomery looks has had issues with volume since returning from injury as he has just 15 touches in each of the two games, but the good news here is that Khalil Herbert had just one carry last week. This is David Montgomery’s offense facing one of the worst run defenses in the NFL. Mark Ingram is a cheap Alvin Kamara with Kamara once again ruled out. What has been the most surprising for Ingram is that he has averaged 5 receptions over the last three games which is not something historically Ingram has been known for.
WIDE RECEIVERS
NAME |
OPP. |
SALARY |
CASH? |
GPP STARS |
NOTES |
@NO |
$4,800 |
Yes |
«««« |
Great savings target, New Orleans has struggled stopping secondary receivers. Sanders facing his former team could have a big day this week. |
|
LV |
$6,900 |
- |
«««« |
Returning from concussion, but great GPP play this week with highest upside on the board. |
|
DET |
$5,700 |
Yes |
«««« |
Very affordable at $5,700, only 5 receptions last week, but saw 16 targets against Baltimore while still amounting 121 yards. Target share indicates a potential huge game this week. |
|
DAL |
$5,600 |
Yes |
«««« |
Leads the Raiders in red zone targets, averaging 6 receptions per game over last three weeks since Henry Ruggs released. |
|
WAS |
$5,900 |
- |
««« |
Disappointed last week when Lamb went out, but is better as a complimentary piece instead of the primary piece. Price is a little high at $5,900 |
|
DET |
$3,800 |
- |
««« |
Darnell Mooney is going to get most of the love this week, but Andy Dalton took several shots deep last week to Goodwin who topped 100 yards last week. Price is too low |
|
BUF |
$4,500 |
Yes |
«« |
Low upside, and has struggled over the last few weeks, but with New Orleans game planning to take out Diggs, Beasley has five or more catch upside in this game. |
|
CHI |
$4,200 |
- |
«« |
Averaging 5 receptions over his last 6 games. The problem is he has not scored a touchdown this season. He is a great stacking option with Goff, or an under the radar sneaky play if he can find the end-zone. |
|
TreQuan Smith |
BUF |
$4,400 |
Yes |
«« |
Marquez Callaway will likely draw TreDavious White this week which means TreQuan should see some extra looks. Averaging 4 receptions per game over his last three games returning from injury and 50 yards per game. Low end cash game play. |
@PIT |
$7,900 |
- |
« |
Price is too high, and his roster percentage is still going to be 30-40% this week. Diggs has just two 100-yard game on the season, and is likely a fade this week. |
|
@DAL |
$3,900 |
- |
« |
Low-end GPP play. Has not done anything since Henry Ruggs’ departure but is averaging 20 yards per catch and has big play potential at any time. |
This is a week where there are no slam dunk options at the wide receiver position. Both Stefon Diggs and CeeDee Lamb are going to see a high amount of ownership this week, but the question that you have to ask yourself is whether you want to go above the ownership or if you want to fade those players and try to build a roster with the middle ground. There are a number of cheap options this week who are possession type receivers such as Hunter Renfrow, Cole Beasley, TreQuan Smith, along with upside receivers in Darnell Mooney and Marquise Goodwin. Of the two, Lamb is more intriguing simply because he is significantly cheaper and in a better matchup as the Saints take away your elite receiver as evidenced by A.J. Brown, Mike Evans, and DK Metcalf (one long catch that should have been called offensive pass interference). Expect the Saints to try to take Diggs out of this game this week. Both Lamb and Gallup make for great pivots off of Ezekiel Elliott if you want to have a Dak Prescott stack and believe that the Cowboys will put up a lot of points this week.
TIGHT ENDS
NAME |
OPP. |
SALARY |
CASH? |
GPP STARS |
NOTES |
CHI |
$5,200 |
Yes |
«««« |
Under the radar play, but he is still the number one receiver in this offense as he has a target share of 28% or more in four of his last five games |
|
@DAL |
$6,400 |
Yes |
««« |
High priced, and will be highly rostered. Solid cash game play due to his high floor, but the question will be whether he has the upside needed at $6,400 to reach GPP value. He hasn’t had the monster games that we’ve come to expect from Waller. |
|
@DET |
$4,400 |
- |
««« |
High upside play, five touchdowns on the season looked great in his second game back from injury |
|
LV |
$5,300 |
- |
«« |
Very similar player to T.J. Hockenson, but Hockenson will be lower rostered and have more of a guaranteed role in this offense. Schultz has struggled over the last four games and with Lamb active he will be the third or even fourth target based on the running back receiving threats. |
|
@DET |
$3,700 |
- |
« |
Cheap play, but will be higher rostered than he should be. Outside of a game against Pittsburgh he has struggled especially with Andy Dalton at quarterback. |
|
WAS |
$3,800 |
- |
« |
Needs to score to reach value. Dalton likes him. |
If you’ve made it this far into the article, you’re probably sensing a trend which is to fade the Cowboys this week. They are going to be the highest rostered at almost every position and the tight end is no different. While the vast majority of the roster percentage is going to go to Darren Waller on this slate, Dalton Schultz is probably not too far behind him in the 20-25% range. Finding a player such as T.J. Hockenson who love to hate due to his perceived low upside, has 8 or more targets in four of his last five games. Regarding Darren Waller, there’s not much to say negatively about him other than he is going to be highly rostered on this slate. He’s a great cash game option, although he has not shown the upside that he has shown in prior years as he has just two touchdowns on the season and only two games above 65 yards.
TEAM DEFENSES
NAME |
OPP. |
SALARY |
CASH? |
GPP STARS |
NOTES |
Bears |
@DET |
$3,000 |
Yes |
«« |
Lead the NFL in sacks against a winless Lions team. Great cash game play, however as a GPP play approach with caution as they will be extremely popular and defense scoring is incredibly volatile. |
Saints |
BUF |
$2,900 |
- |
««« |
One of the best defensive lines in the NFL, could be a great pivot off of Josh Allen who has thrown five interceptions over his last three games. |
Bills |
@NO |
$3,100 |
- |
««« |
Second in the NFL in interceptions, Trevor Siemian has come out and said the team needs to be urgent, and he threw two interceptions last week, so if he tries forcing the ball this week, there could be opportunity for Buffalo. |
Cowboys |
LV |
$3,300 |
- |
«« |
Third in the NFL in interceptions. They take risks, but Derek Carr does have 9 interceptions on the season. Not much of a pass rush as they are in the bottom half of the NFL in sacks |
Lions |
CHI |
$2,400 |
- |
« |
Cheap and facing Andy Dalton |
Raiders |
DAL |
$2,400 |
- |
« |
Hoping to get lucky if you take the Raiders here. |