My 2026 Footballguys Subscriber Contest Strategy

An analytical approach to constructing a Subscriber Contest entry.

David Zacharias's My 2026 Footballguys Subscriber Contest Strategy David Zacharias Published 09/05/2026

Our Subscriber Contest is free for premium subscribers to enter.
The deadline to submit/edit your contest entry is 8:00 pm (ET) on Wednesday, September 9th, 2026.
Click here to play.

The fantasy football landscape has evolved since this contest was first introduced on August 7th. Players have been traded to new teams. Position battles have been resolved. Injuries have taken their toll. Player values and projections have changed.

Let's look at several strategies for submitting (or revising) your Subscriber Contest entry to take advantage of these recent developments.

Your approach will lie somewhere on the spectrum between "wing it" and "compute it", depending on the time you have available and your overall interest in mathematical analysis. Use the approach you're most comfortable with.

If you're curious to explore the analysis-heavy end of the spectrum, this article is for you.

IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect Christopher Trim Subscriber Contest

We'll start by discussing three strategies for constructing your action plan:

  1. Maximize Return on Investment
  2. Manage Bye Weeks
  3. Handcuff Premium Starters

Then we'll finish up with a discussion of Team Defenses and Place Kickers.

Put on your analysis cap. Let's see what the numbers tell us.

Strategy 1 - Maximize Return on Investment (ROI)

In the context of entering the Subscriber Contest, your investment is the $250 spending cap you have for your player selections. Your return is measured in projected fantasy points, which is determined by marrying projected performance statistics (passing completions, rushing yards, receptions, etc.) to the contest scoring rules.

A player's expected return on investment (FPs/$ or ROI) is the ratio of his projected fantasy points (Projected FPs) to his contest cap dollars (Contest $). The contest cap dollars are published as part of the scoring rules and will not change.

Strategy 1 thus boils down to selecting the set of players (within the contest guidelines) you project to score the most fantasy points. There's a twist, however: these projected points must be distributed over the 17 weeks of the contest such that your roster stays above the survivor-style cut line every week. That's where your bye week distribution comes into play. More on that in our Strategy 2 discussion below. 

There are numerous sources of player projections. You can use those provided by your league host, the ones available through your Footballguys subscription, or you can make up your own. I'm partial to the numbers behind door number two, so for the analysis in this article, we'll reference the Footballguys expert projections as of September 2nd.

In the following four sections, we'll explore the numbers for quarterbacks, running backs, wide receivers, and tight ends.

Quarterbacks

Contest $ Player Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
28 J. Allen Buf/7 430.7 15.4 26
25 J. Burrow Cin/6 411.7 16.5 23
25 D. Maye NE/11 407.2 16.3 24
24 L. Jackson Bal/13 385.5 16.1 25
23 J. Hurts Phi/10 379.9 16.5 22
17 M. Stafford LAR/11 376.7 22.2 12
18 J. Herbert LAC/7 375.7 20.9 16
20 D. Prescott Dal/14 373.2 18.7 20
20 C. Williams Chi/10 371.8 18.6 21
18 T. Lawrence Jac/7 367.5 20.4 17
18 B. Purdy SF/8 366.2 20.3 18
16 J. Goff Det/6 363.2 22.7 11
17 P. Mahomes KC/5 363.0 21.4 14
17 B. Nix Den/10 362.7 21.3 15
24 J. Daniels Was/7 358.6 14.9 27
15 B. Mayfield TB/10 352.7 23.5 8
16 J. Dart NYG/8 350.6 21.9 13
14 J. Love GB/11 344.2 24.6 6
17 K. Murray Min/6 342.1 20.1 19
14 C. Stroud Hou/8 328.0 23.4 9
13 D. Jones Ind/13 326.8 25.1 5
14 T. Shough NO/8 323.8 23.1 10
11 S. Darnold Sea/11 309.1 28.1 2
13 M. Willis Mia/6 306.0 23.5 7
10 B. Young Car/5 300.5 30.1 1
11 A. Rodgers Pit/9 298.2 27.1 3
11 C. Ward Ten/9 297.4 27.0 4

Observations

  1. Matthew Stafford has the 6th-highest projection at the 12th-highest contest price.
  2. Jared Goff has the 11th-highest ROI at the 16th-highest contest price.  

My Contest Strategy

In addition to Stafford and Goff, I wanted to choose either Justin Herbert or Trevor Lawrence, both of whom are QB1s having a week 7 bye, the same contest cost, and nearly equal projected fantasy points. I chose Lawrence, as he has a more favorable schedule during the final four weeks of the contest.

All three quarterbacks have different bye weeks and are ranked in the top 12 at the position.

Running Backs

To identify value selections at the running back position, let's look at those ranked in the top 40 for both projected fantasy points and ROI.

The following table lists the running backs who meet those criteria, ranked from highest projected fantasy points to lowest.

Contest $ Player Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
16 D. Swift (RB16) Chi/10 189.7 11.9 33
17 Q. Judkins (RB18) Cle/11 188.4 11.1 40
13 J. Price (RB26) Sea/11 151.7 11.7 35
12 K. Gainwell (RB30) TB/10 139.5 11.6 36
10 J. Brooks (RB31) Car/5 134.2 13.4 23
11 J. Dobbins (RB32) Den/10 132.7 12.1 31
9 J. Mason (RB34) Min/6 130.8 14.5 17
11 R. Harvey (RB36) Den/10 125.8 11.4 37
8 J. Croskey-Merritt (RB37) Was/7 125.0 15.6 12
8 B. Corum (RB38) LAR/11 122.4 15.3 14
10 K. Monangai (RB40) Chi/10 113.0 11.3 39

My Contest Strategy

spent 28.8% of my contest budget on Derrick Henry, plus four running backs listed in the table above (D'Andre Swift, Quinshon Judkins, Jordan Mason, and Jacory Croskey-Merritt). They all have different bye weeks; only one (Henry) has a bye week after Week11.

 

IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect by Streve Roberts

Wide Receivers

To identify value selections at the wide receiver position, let's look at players ranked in the top 60 for both projected fantasy points and ROI.

The following table lists the wide receivers who meet those criteria, listed from most projected fantasy points to least.

Contest $ Player Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
12 C. Godwin (WR35) TB/10 170.8 14.2 44
12 W. Robinson (WR39) Ten/9 163.0 13.6 48
12 M. Golden (WR41) GB/11 162.1 13.5 49
13 Q. Johnston (WR42) LAC/7 160.2 12.3 60
12 J. Reed (WR43) GB/11 155.9 13.0 53
12 J. Downs (WR44) Ind/13 154.4 12.9 54
12 J. Addison (WR45) Min/6 153.2 12.8 56
9 K. Concepcion (WR46) Cle/11 149.0 16.6 34
9 R. Doubs (WR47) NE/11 144.3 16.0 36
10 J. Meyers (WR49) Jac/7 140.1 14.0 46
9 X. Worthy (WR50) KC/5 136.9 15.2 39
10 K. Shakir (WR51) Buf/7 134.5 13.5 50
9 J. Coker (WR52) Car/5 133.2 14.8 40
8 D. Boston (WR53) Cle/11 132.6 16.6 33
8 T. Tucker (WR54) LV/13 130.7 16.3 35
10 D. Samuel (WR55) SF/8 126.3 12.6 58
10 M. Lemon (WR56) Phi/10 124.1 12.4 59
8 J. Nailor (WR57) LV/13 123.8 15.5 38
6 M. Washington (WR58) Mia/6 123.5 20.6 20
4 K. Boutte (WR59) Hou/8 123.1 30.8 10
5 D. Stribling (WR60) SF/8 123.0 24.6 17

My Contest Strategy

This is the riskiest position in my submission portfolio. My configuration strategy features only one top-25 receiver (Jameson Williams) and thus bets on weekly spike performances from one or two of the other five rostered wideouts (Chris Godwin Jr., Wan'Dale Robinson, KC Concepcion, De'Zhaun Stribling, and Kayshon Boutte).

The six occupy five different bye weeks, the latest of which is Week 11.

Tight Ends

To identify value selections at the tight end position, we'll look at players ranked in the top 35 for both projected fantasy points and ROI.

The following table lists the tight ends who meet those criteria, ranked from highest projected fantasy points to lowest.

Contest $ Player Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
21 T. Kelce (TE6) KC/5 204.6 9.7 35
15 G. Kittle (TE7) SF/8 191.1 12.7 24
16 I. Likely (TE8) NYG/8 189.9 11.9 28
15 D. Goedert (TE11) Phi/10 181.3 12.1 27
16 S. LaPorta (TE12) Det/6 175.6 11.0 33
17 M. Andrews (TE13) Bal/13 173.0 10.2 34
13 D. Kincaid (TE14) Buf/7 165.4 12.7 25
11 J. Johnson (TE15) NO/8 163.0 14.8 18
14 J. Ferguson (TE16) Dal/14 161.8 11.6 29
12 B. Strange (TE17) Jac/7 151.6 12.6 26
10 H. Henry (TE18) NE/11 151.1 15.1 15
10 T. Hockenson (TE19) Min/6 149.3 14.9 17
9 C. Okonkwo (TE20) Was/7 146.3 16.3 11
11 D. Schultz (TE21) Hou/8 144.6 13.1 22
10 K. Sadiq (TE22) NYJ/13 141.6 14.2 20
9 A. Barner (TE23) Sea/11 135.2 15.0 16
7 T. Ferguson (TE24) LAR/11 134.5 19.2 3
8 C. Otton (TE25) TB/10 133.8 16.7 9
8 P. Freiermuth (TE26) Pit/9 125.8 15.7 12
6 E. Engram (TE27) Den/10 119.6 19.9 2
8 G. Helm (TE28) Ten/9 116.2 14.5 19
7 G. Dulcich (TE29) Mia/6 108.4 15.5 13
6 M. Gesicki (TE30) Cin/6 100.0 16.7 10
5 C. Parkinson (TE31) LAR/11 90.1 18.0 6
8 O. Gadsden (TE32) LAC/7 88.9 11.1 32
 

My Contest Strategy

I dropped just 14.8% of my contest budget on four of the tight ends listed in the above table: Evan Engram, Hunter Henry, T.J. Hockenson, and Juwan Johnson. They all have different bye weeks, and all of them will be available from Week 12 on. Three are top-19 tight ends; all four have top-18 ROIs.

Weather Considerations

IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

The final four weeks of the contest - when the prizes are won - occur in the month of December. Bad weather can limit the productivity of skill position players in outdoor games.

Arguably, the five coldest outdoor stadiums are Lambeau Field (GB), Highmark Stadium (BUF), Soldier Field (CHI), Gillette Stadium (NE), and Huntington Bank Field (CLE).

Here is the schedule for the teams that will play the most games in these stadiums in December:

Team Week 14 Week 15 Week 16 Week 17 Games
Buffalo Bills @GB CHI @DEN @MIA 2
Chicago Bears @MIA @BUF GB DET 3
Cleveland Browns ATL @NYG @BAL IND 2
Green Bay Packers BUF MIA @CHI HOU 4
New England Patriots MIN @KC @NYJ DEN 2

During this crucial stretch of contest games, the Packers play every game in a historically cold- or bad-weather outdoor stadium. The Bears play in potentially adverse conditions in each of the final three weeks of the contest.

Consider moving off skill position players from these teams if you can find an equally productive alternative.

Overall Recommendations For Maximizing ROI

  1. Do not roster players who became injured after the contest was announced.
  2. Look for recent camp battle winners.
  3. Avoid players from teams that frequently play December games outdoors in stadiums where the weather can limit their fantasy productivity.
  4. Use Footballguys' player upside rating to break ties (examine "Upside" on the Footballguys Rankings page)

Strategy 2 - Manage Bye Weeks

The overarching recommendation of this strategy is: spread out your roster's bye weeks, prioritizing early-season byes over late-season byes.

The following chart shows, for each week preceding the contest finals, the teams on bye, the percentage of contest entries that will be eliminated (%Cut), and the percentage of initial contest entries that will remain after that week's cutdown (%Remaining).

Risk Week Teams on Bye %Cut %Remaining
  1 - - none - - 10 90.0
  2 - - none - - 10 81.0
  3 - - none - - 10 72.9
  4 - - none - - 20 58.3
Low 5 CAR, KCC 20 46.7
Low 6 CIN, DET, MIA, MIN 20 37.3
Low 7 BUF, JAC, LAC, WAS 20 29.9
Medium 8 HOU, NO, NYG, SF 30 20.9
Medium 9 PIT, TEN 30 14.6
Medium 10 CHI, DEN, PHI, TB 30 10.2
High 11 ATL, CLE, GB, LAR, NE, SEA 30 7.2
  12 - - none - - 30 5.0
High 13 BAL, IND, LV, NYJ 40 3.0
Extreme 14 ARI, DAL 40 1.8

Your Panthers and Chiefs players will be available to you for the remainder of the season after Week 5, and you'll just need to be in the top 46.7% of entries to move on to Week 6.

Carefully consider the risk of rostering a heavy concentration of players from the six teams having a Week 11 bye, as 30% of the field will be eliminated that week.

Loading up on Cardinals and Cowboys players may prove fatal to your entry in Week 14, as they won't be available to help you survive the 40% cut leading into the first week of the contest finals.

Next, let's extend your bye week analysis to the position level. My recommendation: every player rostered within a given position group should have a different bye week.

As an example of the dangers of ignoring this advice, should you choose to roster Justin Herbert and Josh Allen (both outstanding fantasy assets), you will have neither player available to start for you in Week 7 - not to mention that you'll have burned 18.4% of your total budget to put yourself in this predicament.

The exception - rostering handcuffs - is discussed next.

Strategy 3 - Handcuff Premium Starters

An injury to a key starter can severely limit your roster's chances of staying above the cut line. Consider setting aside a portion of your budget as insurance to mitigate injury risk.

Using the quarterback position as an example, the following table looks at the cost of acquiring both a starter and his backup. It is sorted in descending order by the cost to acquire the starter.

Team/Bye Quarterbacks Contest $
BUF/7 J. Allen 28
  K. Allen 5
CIN/6 J. Burrow 25
  J. Flacco 6
SF/8 B. Purdy 18
  M. Jones 8
KC/5 P. Mahomes 17
  J. Fields 7
LAR/11 M. Stafford 17
  T. Simpson 5
MIN/6 K. Murray 17
  J. McCarthy 7
GB/11 J. Love 14
  T. Taylor 5
HOU/8 C. Stroud 14
  D. Mills 5
IND/13 D. Jones 13
  R. Leonard 7
PIT/9 A. Rodgers 11
  W. Howard 6
ARI/14 J. Brissett 10
  C. Beck 7
ATL/11 T. Tagovailoa 8
  M. Penix Jr. 6
CLE/11 D. Watson 8
  S. Sanders 6
LV/13 F. Mendoza 8
  K. Cousins 8

Consider handcuffing premium starters. For example, Josh Allen and Joe Burrow are both projected QB1s; their backups cost $5 and $6, respectively, to roster as insurance.

Note that several high-profile quarterbacks (e.g., Drake Maye, Lamar Jackson, Jayden Daniels, and Jalen Hurts) do not have their backups available to be rostered in this contest. There are no inexpensive injury-risk backup options for these players.

Consider extending this approach across the running back, wide receiver, and tight end positions - especially in situations where you believe the backup will ascend into a highly productive starting role should the starter get injured.

A related strategy is to roster a low-cost pair of players who are in a timeshare or still-unresolved camp battle. There's upside if one of the players gets hurt or wins the camp battle outright, plus the possibility that both players may figure into your week's scoring.

Examples of such running back duos (with their combined acquisition costs and projected fantasy points) include:

What About Team Defenses?

There is little variance in the expected total fantasy points scored by Team Defenses over the course of the contest. The difference between the top-ranked Team DEF and the 20th-ranked Team DEF is 1.2 projected fantasy points per game.

The following table lists the Team Defenses in descending order of their total projected fantasy points. The teams with the numerically lowest ROI Rank provide the highest projected fantasy points per contest dollar.

Contest $ Team Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
7 Texans Hou/8 104.9 15.0 29
7 Broncos Den/10 103.0 14.7 31
6 Rams LAR/11 101.9 17.0 22
7 Seahawks Sea/11 98.3 14.0 32
6 Steelers Pit/9 98.2 16.4 23
5 Lions Det/6 97.5 19.5 14
6 Chargers LAC/7 97.2 16.2 24
6 Vikings Min/6 95.0 15.8 25
5 Falcons Atl/11 92.9 18.6 16
6 Eagles Phi/10 92.8 15.5 26
5 Giants NYG/8 91.6 18.3 17
6 Bears Chi/10 91.4 15.2 27
6 Jaguars Jac/7 90.8 15.1 28
5 Buccaneers TB/10 90.7 18.1 18
5 Colts Ind/13 90.3 18.1 19
5 Patriots NE/11 89.2 17.8 20
6 Bills Buf/7 89.2 14.9 30
4 Saints NO/8 88.5 22.1 7
3 Commanders Was/7 88.4 29.5 1
4 Packers GB/11 88.3 22.1 8
5 Ravens Bal/13 87.9 17.6 21
4 Browns Cle/11 87.2 21.8 9
3 Dolphins Mia/6 86.0 28.7 2
3 Raiders LV/13 84.9 28.3 3
4 Chiefs KC/5 84.2 21.1 10
4 Cowboys Dal/14 84.2 21.1 11
4 Panthers Car/5 83.7 20.9 12
3 Jets NYJ/13 83.6 27.9 4
3 Titans Ten/9 83.2 27.7 5
4 Bengals Cin/6 81.8 20.5 13
3 Cardinals Ari/14 80.3 26.8 6
4 49ers SF/8 75.8 19.0 15

Keep in mind that the contest scoring only provides points for sacks, fumble recoveries, interceptions, and defensive touchdowns. The number of points given up to opposing offenses does not affect the Team DEF point total.

Consider these recommendations for your Team DEF selection plan:

  1. Spread your total Team Defense budget (nominally $12 to $17) over three or four teams to increase your chances of catching a spike week.
  2. Maximize the number of selections having an early-season bye week.
  3. Minimize duplication of bye weeks so, at most, only one of your Team DEFs will be excluded from consideration in any given week.

My Contest Strategy

Given the low scoring variance at the position, I chose to roster four Team DEFs (WAS, MIA, NOS, and ATL) while only expending 15 contest dollars. Three of the teams offer a top-seven ROI. From Week 9 on, the only week I won't have four shots at a spike week is Week 11 - and then I'll still have three.

For a deeper look at 2026 NFL team defenses, check out Footballguy Ryan Weisse's article here.

Do Kickers Matter?

IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect Jeffrey Becker

Even though kickers don't get much fantasy love, they do have a role in this contest.

As with the Team DEFs, the variance in total expected fantasy points scored for kickers is small. The following table is sorted from best to worst return on investment.

Contest $ Player Team/Bye Projected FPs FPs/$ ROI Rank
3 A. Szmyt Cle/11 129.1 43.0 1
3 C. Ryland Ari/14 128.6 42.9 2
3 T. Bass Buf/7 125.4 41.8 3
3 M. Gay LV/13 113.9 38.0 4
3 J. Slye Ten/9 112.1 37.4 5
4 W. Reichard Min/6 146.3 36.6 6
4 H. Butker KC/5 144.8 36.2 7
4 A. Borregales NE/11 144.5 36.1 8
4 E. McPherson Cin/6 144.4 36.1 9
4 C. Boswell Pit/9 143.9 36.0 10
4 N. Folk Atl/11 141.2 35.3 11
4 H. Mevis LAR/11 141.0 35.3 12
3 R. Patterson Mia/6 105.2 35.1 13
4 J. Elliott Phi/10 138.3 34.6 14
4 T. Smack GB/11 132.4 33.1 15
3 J. Sanders NYJ/13 93.3 31.1 16
5 W. Lutz Den/10 149.1 29.8 17
5 C. Santos Chi/10 146.2 29.2 18
6 C. McLaughlin TB/10 152.6 25.4 19
6 C. Little Jac/7 151.5 25.3 20
6 J. Bates Det/6 150.8 25.1 21
6 E. Piñeiro SF/8 150.0 25.0 22
7 J. Myers Sea/11 162.9 23.3 23
7 C. Dicker LAC/7 162.6 23.2 24
7 K. Fairbairn Hou/8 161.8 23.1 25
7 T. Loop Bal/13 155.5 22.2 26
8 B. Aubrey Dal/14 169.0 21.1 27

The recommended plan for this position is the same as it was for Team DEFs: spend $12 to $17 to select three or four options with a high ROI and differing early-season bye weeks. Use potentially adverse weather conditions in outdoor stadiums as your tiebreaker.

My Contest Strategy

I spent $15 to roster four kickers: Tyler Bass, Chris Boswell, Harrison Butker, and Will Reichard, each of whom possesses a different bye week and a top-10 ROI. The group's latest bye week is Week 9. Three are top-16 fantasy options, trailing the highest-projected kicker (Brandon Aubrey) by just 1.6 or fewer points per game.

Refer to Weisse's article on kicker tiers and targets to further inform your selections.

Final Words

You're now armed with a lot of analytical data; all that's left to do is craft a contest winner! Be sure to finalize your roster before Wednesday evening's deadline.

Have fun putting your entry together, and best of luck!

Photos provided by Imagn Images
Share This Article

More by David Zacharias

 

4 Second-Year Players Poised to Surge in 2026

David Zacharias

A deep dive into a quartet of second-year players shows why they are set to break out this season.

06/02/26 Read More
 

My Footballguys Subscriber Contest Strategy

David Zacharias

An analytical approach for constructing your contest entry

09/02/25 Read More
 

Roundtable: Dynasty Trade Strategies

David Zacharias

Blaylock, Fahlsing, Haseley, Song, Tremblay, Wood, and Zacharias share their thoughts on negotiating dynasty trade deals.

08/19/25 Read More
 

T.J. Hockenson: 8 Reasons to Expect a Rebound

David Zacharias

David Zacharias looks deeply at T.J. Hockenson and finds plenty of reasons for optimism.

08/04/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Commissioner's Handbook: Timeless Duties

David Zacharias

Part 7 - Establishing behavioral expectations, keeping communication channels open, and investing in league longevity

07/28/25 Read More
 

Dynasty Commissioner's Handbook: The Offseason Conductor

David Zacharias

Part 6 - Updating your league rules, finding replacement owners, and migrating to the next season

07/21/25 Read More